Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:53:51 -0300
From:      Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@FreeBSD.org>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.wx.mk
Message-ID:  <20061231145351.3a936fa6@phobos.mars.bsd>
In-Reply-To: <1167584731.1320.35.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
References:  <200612310434.kBV4YRXS037540@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061231114135.GZ16049@droso.net> <4597B6DA.7060309@FreeBSD.org> <1167572460.1320.19.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <4597D9D6.3050900@FreeBSD.org> <1167584731.1320.35.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_czGaWvZb9+4OFN8.neCi4lt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:05:31 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Sergey Matveychuk p=ED=B9e v ne 31. 12. 2006 v 18:40 +0300:
> > Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Sergey Matveychuk p=ED=B9e v ne 31. 12. 2006 v 16:10 +0300:
> > >> Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > >>> This broke INDEX as there is no x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28 port and=
 this
> > >>> is now detected.
> > >> As I investigated it affects only on audio/py-karaoke port. So I'll
> > >> commit a fix for this port that looks quite correct anyway:
> > >>
> > >> -USE_WX=3D        2.4+
> > >> +USE_WX=3D        2.4-2.6
> > >=20
> > > So once 2.8 comes out, you promise to revisit this port?
> > >=20
> >=20
> > The port should be checked with 2.8. I'm not sure it'll work with 2.8.
>=20
> The original author felt confident that the port will work with a future
> releases of wxPython, thus he put 2.4+ in the port.
>=20
> If he would not be sure, he would put 2.4-2.6 in there straight away.
>=20
>=20
> When we add a new gcc version, we don't check all ports if they work.
> We assume everything will work, and fix or mark the cases where there's
> a problem. Why we should treat wxPython any different?
>=20

You are right.

Best Regards,
Ale

--Sig_czGaWvZb9+4OFN8.neCi4lt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFl/k3iV05EpRcP2ERAgwwAKDNsV+HlbEExBLQmLgM6JW3Kr/T/ACePX76
FCSrXDklC2X7oKKFrVLLkXs=
=oqJw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_czGaWvZb9+4OFN8.neCi4lt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061231145351.3a936fa6>