Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:49:23 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <lists@wm-access.no>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, aaron.glenn@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: VLAN interfaces on FreeBSD; performance issues
Message-ID:  <4325A383.2030404@wm-access.no>
In-Reply-To: <432579F1.4010807@mac.com>
References:  <ED8E7F5B-7E3F-40D8-8993-76E9AB8226F9@yfug.yumaed.org>	<4322FDC4.8010609@mac.com>	<18f601940509110230242e8bfc@mail.gmail.com>	<43243677.6020707@mac.com> <43254F76.4000505@wm-access.no> <432579F1.4010807@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Swiger wrote:

> The essence of multihoming is having two (or more) distinct NICs.

so if i had two vlan's with an ip on both. wouldnt this qualify it as
multihoming? would i somehow no longer need to configure the computer as
though it was a multihomed?

-- 
Sten Daniel Sørsdal



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4325A383.2030404>