Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 May 2009 23:12:41 +0300
From:      Zinevich Denis <link@ngc.net.ua>
To:        "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" <tonix@interazioni.it>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Questions on clustered FS + NFS
Message-ID:  <4A09D839.9040908@ngc.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <4A080C45.7010003@interazioni.it>
References:  <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> <4A080927.2080307@eenet.ee> <4A080C45.7010003@interazioni.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The same issue for me. I have SAN connected to 4 servers. I was 
searching for such fs for about a week several month ago. I have not 
found anything matching this task. What was close - CODA. Now i do not 
exactly remember why it was not suitable for me...
If you found how to solve this question - mail me please, I`m very 
interested in it too.

Link.

Tonix (Antonio Nati) пишет:
> Joel Jans ha scritto:
>> Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>>> I'd love to put all my storage on a clustered NFS (with a ridondant 
>>> iSCSI controller and storage), FreeBSD based of course, but I see 
>>> there is not any clustered FS on FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> So, the solution seems to run a couple of GFS or OCFS2 on some Linux 
>>> servers, more some NFS servers handled by heartbeat.
>>>
>>> Is there any FreeBSD solution I could adopt?
>>>
>>
>> Glusterfs, http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/GlusterFS
>> http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/GlusterFS
>>
>> Joel Jans
>>
>>
> GlusterFS looks to be a distribuited FS.
> What I need is to have two/three servers which are mounting in 
> read/write exactly the same storage (an external iSCSI subsystem), 
> exactly like wonderful old VMS did, or like GFS or OCFS2 seems to do now.
> Both servers must mount the same iSCSI partitions, so they work on the 
> same data.
> 
> Tonino
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A09D839.9040908>