Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:12:35 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq@caraldi.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) Message-ID: <20060829211234.GB1229@watt.intra.caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David Sledge:
> I feel the port itself is solid and ready for the PR to be sent.
+1
> If there are I can submit it as eclipse-devel so that maybe a
> larger user base will start working with it. [...] my only
> question is to ask if it is ok to submit the PR without any
> other ports that depend on the 3.1.2 version of eclipse being
> updated first. Or do I need to submit the port of eclipse 3.2
> first so that the other ports can then be updated to use it?
I suggest to request a repocopy of the current "java/eclipse" to
"java/eclipse32", and submit your new port as an update of
"java/eclipse32". Then if there is interest, the ports depending
on "java/eclipse" can be progressively updated to "java/eclipse32"
if relevant.
Avoid the name "eclipse-devel" as it implies that the port is
regularly updated for the latest Eclipse milestone.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829211234.GB1229>