Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:48:51 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Julian Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative disc usage from /bin/df 6.0-BETA5 Message-ID: <20050927144851.GA12766@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200509271121.j8RBLo0A013221@fire.jhs.private> References: <200509271121.j8RBLo0A013221@fire.jhs.private>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Julian Stacey wrote: > 6.0-BETA5 /bin/df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s4a 253678 91884 141500 39% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > /dev/ad0s4d 253678 141418 91966 61% /var > /dev/ad0s4e 253678 -272 233656 -0% /tmp > /dev/ad0s4f 5421722 3255960 1732026 65% /usr > > 108% is plausible when eg root has eaten most of the reserve allowed by > eg 'newfs -m 10', but ... Negative disc usage just doesnt look right ! umount and fsck..you probably have some fs corruption. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDOVvTWry0BWjoQKURAgWbAKCJPh99ffRUH/yFddFf6yn9nzqAUwCgpnzg zHx4lOnPAUWdjfLSCQ/kzZw= =XGPX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050927144851.GA12766>