Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:41:51 -0400 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions Message-ID: <20110426154151.55adde4e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4DB71875.9030304@onetel.com> References: <BANLkTimo6R615BVC51Rk7aM9RbvnjKtVRg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinEbELz=BTE_zsAnSXK46F4aNEZvg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimSic8Mks1BRPehYYMnYWC6fUPR=A@mail.gmail.com> <4DB71875.9030304@onetel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:09:41 +0100 Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> articulated: > On 26/04/2011 18:45, Jaime Kikpole wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Chris > > Brennan<xaero@xaerolimit.net> wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity, why not rack-mounted boxed? > > > > Space issues. They'll have to either fit on a shelf in one of two > > rooms, depending on the outcome of some other things. > > > > Any thoughts on brand or model? > > If you google for "low power pc" you'll find some interesting > machines mostly mini-itx with atom processors. The Intel Atom is Intel's line of low-power, low-cost and low-performance x86 and x86-64 microprocessors. It sounds like the OP is interested in something more substantial. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies, ignored or reported as Spam. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110426154151.55adde4e>