Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:42:27 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Paul Schenkeveld <freebsd@psconsult.nl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS1 vs UFS2 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302041380.4966@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20121230193926.GA37126@psconsult.nl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20121230193926.GA37126@psconsult.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It makes perfect sense to use UFS1 on systems where space savings matter > unless your application requires any of the new features that are not > present in UFS1. > > Nanobsd(8) for example uses UFS1 by default too. thank you for answering. i don't need any new extra features, just plain filesystem on 60GB filesystem. But question is - will performance be the same, slower or faster?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302041380.4966>