Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:34:23 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] kldunload -f argument. Message-ID: <200407081434.23671.sam@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <7551.1089321028@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <7551.1089321028@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 08 July 2004 02:10 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <xzpn02a5hyl.fsf@dwp.des.no>, > =3D?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D > > writes: > >"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > >> "Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav" writes: > >> > MOD_SHUTDOWN perhaps? > >> > >> We already have that one unfortunately :-( > > > >Ah, silly me. Well, how about MOD_STOP? > > Better, but still not perfect. The problem is that this is the > kind request, not the direct order: We're looking for a sensible > version of: > > MOD_PREPARE_YOURSELF_TO_BE_UNLOADED_BUT_FAIL_IF_YOU_ARE_IN_USE_PLEASE > > :-) MOD_BIKESHED
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407081434.23671.sam>