Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 01:48:25 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" <ej.cerejo@laposte.net> To: Bob Perry <rperry4@earthlink.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portupgrade Update Message-ID: <3EC71EA9.2000005@laposte.net> References: <3EC6E66B.8050203@earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It take a little bit more to upgrade your installed ports than just use portupgrade! Most probably you started using portupgrade without doing pkgdb -F first and portsdb -Uu. You should uninstall every port that has double versions installed, uninstall both of them and then follow the instructions on this site to upgrade and reinstall the ports: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Bob Perry wrote: > I ran pkg_info after upgrading the ports tree and found two versions of > the same package, imake-4.2.0_1 and imake-4.3.0. I was about to > deinstall the earlier version but first wanted to check the package > requirements with the pkg_info -rR command. The ouput indicated that > imake-4.2.0_1 was required by 95 packages in my system. Twenty-one of > these packages also appeared in output I received after running the same > command on imake-4.3.0. My packages were over 90% current. I expected > to see only one package requiring the older version. Can anyone help me > make sense of this? > > Thanks, > Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EC71EA9.2000005>