Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:22:09 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Maho Nakata <maho@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/g95 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/g95/files patch-fibheap.c patch-mf-impl.h Message-ID: <20040202052209.GA86187@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040202051822.GA86130@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200402012320.i11NKNng030190@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040202041956.GA85518@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040202051822.GA86130@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 09:18:22PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 08:19:56PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > Also, I build and run 250000 LOC of Fortran 77 and
> > Fortran 90 through gfortran several times a week without
> > patching the source. Why are patch-fibheap.c and
> > patch-mf-impl.h necessary? Have you filed a PR with
> > GCC?
> >
>
> patch-mf-impl.h is an unnecessary patch. You should add
> --disable-libmudflap to the configure arguments. gfortran
> does use libmudflap, so you're wasting time to build it.
^
not
Whoops.
--
Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202052209.GA86187>