Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:59:16 GMT From: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: git: d36b5dbe28d8 - main - libc: regex: rework unsafe pointer arithmetic Message-ID: <202101081959.108JxGnb061971@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The branch main has been updated by kevans: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=d36b5dbe28d8ebab219fa29db533734d47f0c4a3 commit d36b5dbe28d8ebab219fa29db533734d47f0c4a3 Author: Miod Vallat <miod@online.fr> AuthorDate: 2021-01-08 18:59:00 +0000 Commit: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2021-01-08 19:58:35 +0000 libc: regex: rework unsafe pointer arithmetic regcomp.c uses the "start + count < end" idiom to check that there are "count" bytes available in an array of char "start" and "end" both point to. This is fine, unless "start + count" goes beyond the last element of the array. In this case, pedantic interpretation of the C standard makes the comparison of such a pointer against "end" undefined, and optimizers from hell will happily remove as much code as possible because of this. An example of this occurs in regcomp.c's bothcases(), which defines bracket[3], sets "next" to "bracket" and "end" to "bracket + 2". Then it invokes p_bracket(), which starts with "if (p->next + 5 < p->end)"... Because bothcases() and p_bracket() are static functions in regcomp.c, there is a real risk of miscompilation if aggressive inlining happens. The following diff rewrites the "start + count < end" constructs into "end - start > count". Assuming "end" and "start" are always pointing in the array (such as "bracket[3]" above), "end - start" is well-defined and can be compared without trouble. As a bonus, MORE2() implies MORE() therefore SEETWO() can be simplified a bit. PR: 252403 --- lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c b/lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c index 076b9c525a65..970a448b649a 100644 --- a/lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c +++ b/lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c @@ -177,10 +177,10 @@ static char nuls[10]; /* place to point scanner in event of error */ */ #define PEEK() (*p->next) #define PEEK2() (*(p->next+1)) -#define MORE() (p->next < p->end) -#define MORE2() (p->next+1 < p->end) +#define MORE() (p->end - p->next > 0) +#define MORE2() (p->end - p->next > 1) #define SEE(c) (MORE() && PEEK() == (c)) -#define SEETWO(a, b) (MORE() && MORE2() && PEEK() == (a) && PEEK2() == (b)) +#define SEETWO(a, b) (MORE2() && PEEK() == (a) && PEEK2() == (b)) #define SEESPEC(a) (p->bre ? SEETWO('\\', a) : SEE(a)) #define EAT(c) ((SEE(c)) ? (NEXT(), 1) : 0) #define EATTWO(a, b) ((SEETWO(a, b)) ? (NEXT2(), 1) : 0) @@ -1013,15 +1013,17 @@ p_bracket(struct parse *p) wint_t ch; /* Dept of Truly Sickening Special-Case Kludges */ - if (p->next + 5 < p->end && strncmp(p->next, "[:<:]]", 6) == 0) { - EMIT(OBOW, 0); - NEXTn(6); - return; - } - if (p->next + 5 < p->end && strncmp(p->next, "[:>:]]", 6) == 0) { - EMIT(OEOW, 0); - NEXTn(6); - return; + if (p->end - p->next > 5) { + if (strncmp(p->next, "[:<:]]", 6) == 0) { + EMIT(OBOW, 0); + NEXTn(6); + return; + } + if (strncmp(p->next, "[:>:]]", 6) == 0) { + EMIT(OEOW, 0); + NEXTn(6); + return; + } } if ((cs = allocset(p)) == NULL)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202101081959.108JxGnb061971>