Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:54:22 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <5021645E.9020900@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 05/08/12 18:13, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >>>> with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be >>>> the differentiator. >>> true. it is consistently slow. >>> >>> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. >> >> There is no tale, only a feature set: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features >> > > And everything everyone writes is always true. > Did you read the foot notes ? the subsequent links ? Regards,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021645E.9020900>