Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 18:15:42 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Nicholas Charles Brawn <ncb05@uow.edu.au>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation failure (was Star-office) Message-ID: <199805280845.SAA09947@cain.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 01:16:08 MST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.980528010801.4448D-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> they are trying to be smart and using a LINUX procfs feature that we don't > support. probably trying to find out something about their command line.. > (what an odd idea what's wrong with argv/argc?) Yeah, I had wondered that myself.. Seemed kinda dumb :( > probably due to this failure, they are leaping off into space > and doing an illegal memory reference. To their credit, they are trapping > that, cleaning up and sending themselves a signal to force a core-dump. Mm.. doesn't make up for the totally weird access to /proc =) > probably JUSTRETURN may not be the best return value, as the program > may not realise it had an error. > try truss, as that gives better information under linux emulation I'm > told. OK, I'll give it a go --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805280845.SAA09947>