Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0 & pod2man & ports Message-ID: <200007111739.KAA53177@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net> References: <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > On 10 Jul, Will Andrews wrote: > > >> Only if ports-base isn't anymore in ports-all or my local CVS tree is > > > > ports-base was/has never [been] in ports-all, for some strange reason. > > Really? [...] > I read this as: If you didn't use "ports-all", you have to use > "ports-base". If you use "ports-all", "ports-base" is already included. You are correct. The ports-all collection includes ports-base, and that has always been the case. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007111739.KAA53177>