Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:27:21 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> To: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> Cc: Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org>, "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: NATM hardware available Message-ID: <495246C9.9090305@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <495165D8.2070409@dlr.de> References: <55f001c9639d$875f14ec$7202020a@internal.cacheflow.com> <4950F770.3090700@dlr.de> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302A8BCC4@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <495165D8.2070409@dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hartmut Brandt wrote: > > In any case there is still an Todo on my side: the routing information > for NETNATM is currently lost somewhere between L2 and L3 :-) I guess > I come back to you in the new year to fix this issue... Have to fetch > my ATM equipment from the corner where it is collecting dust to setup > a testbed. Guys: Native NATM support would be nice, because it lets FreeBSD be used as a direct ADSL endpoint without an external ADSL router. I have a pair of ATM25 cards, an ATM25 crossover, and an ATM25-to-ADSL G.DMT modem bagged up ready to ship to someone who has the time and motivation to work on NATM. Also: I did have an ATM25 capable switch which I left at ICSI in Berkeley, I don't know where it is at the moment due to people movements. thanks BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?495246C9.9090305>