Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:33:58 -0500
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org,  dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 74bd20769706 - main - Reference newfs_msdos(8) from the newfs(8) manual
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2B9OgH%2BPyXFvF144TDfcmvCc2t%2BP-6Y0gKerWcjWi3Jmw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <X/i/jU5j3p2NsHyy@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <202101070924.1079OE4g081849@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <X/dQAejFbWFxM8Uu@kib.kiev.ua> <52e99dc8-cd75-a2ab-7670-b81d8aaa8134@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfrGAhcmdQvsLWepEx--sRD7gan2zVCbFsbBKOwNcM0Cow@mail.gmail.com> <X/i/jU5j3p2NsHyy@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 15:25, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If there is some explanation along the lines that newfs is the common
> name prefix for utilities creating filesystems, with the suffix being
> the type of fs, for instance newfs_msdos(8) etc, then it becomes useful
> and reasonable.

I agree. It would be useful to mention that newfs is "special" with
respect to naming; presumably we would call it newfs_ufs if we were
now adding it where it did not already exist. Perhaps this should be a
NOTES or similar section before the SEE ALSO?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2B9OgH%2BPyXFvF144TDfcmvCc2t%2BP-6Y0gKerWcjWi3Jmw>