Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:03:30 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh <arved@arved.at> To: cvs-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/cgi Makefile query-pr.cgi querypr-code.cgi Message-ID: <fd76966b6256039655f40c3b4aeefdb5@arved.at> In-Reply-To: <1131817665.52725.58.camel@localhost> References: <20051112141152.GT94004@submonkey.net> <1131813973.52725.36.camel@localhost> <20051112172425.GU94004@submonkey.net> <20051112.103529.123972777.imp@bsdimp.com> <1131817665.52725.58.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 12, 2005, at 18:47, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Is this obscuring really needed? The email address will get copied to > the commit log, which got stored on our website, on FreshPorts, gets > mailed to mailing list, from there it goes to a dozen of web archive > sites and also gets to the newsgroup. Hell, even PR copies are being > posted on usenet, raw, and unobscured. They also go to freebsd-bugs > mailing list, again with an web archive online. > > If one whiner whines about his email address displayed on project > website, then he should be told to not submit at all. Or to use private > mail to an interested committer instead. The loss would be minimal. > > Are we going to extend this email address hiding to all other places? > That would lead to an inability to contact originator of a given > change/feature/new port. That would be a major problem for the project. ACK. Excerpt from send-pr: SEND-PR: BE ADVISED THAT FREEBSD PROBLEM REPORTS ARE PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SEND-PR: WILL BE PUBLISHED AS-IS ON THE PROJECT'S MAILING LISTS AND WEB SITES. SEND-PR: DO NOT SUBMIT ANY INFORMATION YOU DO NOT WANT MADE PUBLIC. maybe we should add something like: YES, THIS INCLUDES YOUR EMAIL-ADDRESS!!!1 regards tilman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fd76966b6256039655f40c3b4aeefdb5>