Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:18:58 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <20030501191858.GA778@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305011046140.73226-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <XFMail.20030501140549.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 01:28:20PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > A lot of folks are focused on qpopper and strlcpy. I believe that > the big picture is being missed. Likely. It would probably be a good idea (IFF we continue the discussion) to have a clear list of problems and/or behavioural changes and possible solutions for any of those problems and/or changes and then discuss the items that are unrelated in seperate discussions. I would also like to promote the behaviour that libc changes constitute ABI breakages unless proven otherwise. Party on Wayne! Party on Garth! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030501191858.GA778>