Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:47:25 +0200 From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@inf.enst.fr> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KAME integration and plans Message-ID: <2000-07-05-12-47-26%2Btrackit%2Bsam@inf.enst.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050314090.84259-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 03:37:39AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050314090.84259-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: | I intend to MFC this stuff in 4 or 5 days assuming it doesn't present any | problems, so this means we need everyone who is capable of doing so to | stress the new code as much as possible. IMO we *really* need to get this | into 4.1 despite the relatively short testing cycle, for the simple reason | that the newer code is much more functional, and in particular supports | the racoon IKE daemon for automatic management of IPSEFC security | associations (i.e. manually-keyed SAs are no longer required) - this is | already in ports. This is important for interoperability with other IPSEC | implementations. How hard would it be to use IPSEC with *.freebsd.org machines (at least www.freebsd.org)? This would be a good test. Of course, IPSEC should not be required ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2000-07-05-12-47-26%2Btrackit%2Bsam>