Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:52 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>, <ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: semantics of 'not-applicable' options in ipfw ? Message-ID: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F5D977C@exchange.wanglobal.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As the subject says... what is people's opinion on the best=20 > semantics for 'not-applicable' options in ipfw rules ? >=20 I think 'none'. _// Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F5D977C>