Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 02:49:00 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lkm Makefile Message-ID: <hCifmxmOH1@ache.dialup.ru> In-Reply-To: <199601062315.PAA27225@freefall.freebsd.org>; from Peter Wemm at Sat, 6 Jan 1996 15:15:42 -0800 (PST) References: <199601062315.PAA27225@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199601062315.PAA27225@freefall.freebsd.org> Peter Wemm
writes:
>peter 96/01/06 15:15:41
> Modified: lkm Makefile
> Log:
> Detach fpu and gnufpu from Makefile.. These lkm's build (or used to)
> but are not quite useable. (fpu is used by init, and process switch
> apparently..)
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.20 +5 -2 src/lkm/Makefile
When they are enabled, people are sure that they at least compiles
when yet one kernel change occurse. If you disable them, chance
to detect compile failures becomes very little...
What wrong happens if they are enabled/installed even not functional?
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hCifmxmOH1>