Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:29:13 +0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Thomas K." <fwd@gothschlampen.com>
Subject:   Re: Memstick image differences between 8.x and 9.x
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomsBVhfuMnXkyDaBTZng4RsByJ9gL%2BnQheiTppn95wFTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E9103D3.4000706@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20111008155252.GA24223.edited@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <CAGH67wTeHVfb01Bc51%2Bd=XCct7cUBfobcg5zWM-Rn%2B3bdM43cg@mail.gmail.com> <4E90B4B1.7000009@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmomV2Ps=TrF0sw6B5KxerbN13avk_erXir6B63ajOqN3sA@mail.gmail.com> <4E9103D3.4000706@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 October 2011 10:15, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Yep, and I also recall you bringing this up in IRC. =A0Though, at that
> time (well, up until a few hours ago), I wasn't aware of the Lenovo
> issue Warren mentioned.
>
> So, that said, I happily stand corrected. =A0I am now aware of a few GPT
> memstick issues. :)

Can we please flip off GPT partitions for memstick images?: )



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomsBVhfuMnXkyDaBTZng4RsByJ9gL%2BnQheiTppn95wFTA>