Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:28:22 -0700 From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: "Brian J. McGovern" <bmcgover@cisco.com> Cc: bmah@freebsd.org, Hans Ottevanger <hansot@iae.nl>, qa@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com Subject: Re: /usr/@LongLink is here again Message-ID: <200205302028.g4UKSMGH043252@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <200205301947.g4UJlGw82433@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> References: <200205301947.g4UJlGw82433@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, "Brian J. McGovern" wrote: > So perhaps its time to get up to a current GNU tar? Hey Brian-- I'd say it's *past* time. But this seems to come up, oh, about every year or so, and a big impediment to moving forward seems to be divergence of what's in the base system from what was done in the vendor import. That shouldn't a showstopper (look at the recent gcc-3.1 import to -CURRENT), but nobody's done it yet. I'm pretty sure it won't happen for 4.6-RELEASE. :-) Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205302028.g4UKSMGH043252>