Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:29:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de> To: muc-lists-freebsd-stable@moderators.muc.de Subject: Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ? Message-ID: <2vbk8aF2jir87U1@uni-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <41907C91.9000706@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Rob wrote: > both have > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5 > > although the first one claims to download CURRENT. > > And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and > why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ? It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. That's the reason why it should not be renamed. The standard-supfile contains the standard tag of your release to keep it up to date. Maybe someone will change this sentence to 'This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the FreeBSD-stable source tree.' soon. Björnhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2vbk8aF2jir87U1>