Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:51:06 +0200 From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature-poor default WPA userland software (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) configuration -- is it inetntional? Message-ID: <201208241951.06694.bschmidt@techwires.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon2Bxn1r8QDohKxePYE=b2ctpA4ArfAqNeO314PyR0Lug@mail.gmail.com> References: <199007581.20120824202155@serebryakov.spb.ru> <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> <CAJ-Vmon2Bxn1r8QDohKxePYE=b2ctpA4ArfAqNeO314PyR0Lug@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 24 August 2012 19:15:10 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 24 August 2012 10:10, Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> wrote: > > There is more interesting stuff available which needs someone to look > > into, eg. briding support and VLANs. I guess the bridging stuff is > > required to get 11r running. 11w though requires hardware support if > > I'm not totally of. > > > > There are even a lot of 11n options available which are currently not > > supported nor in any other way tunable, this requires stack work, not > > only for the supplicant but also for ifconfig. > > There's also likely a whole bunch of driver and stack things we need. > Eg, we need correct VLAN handling (which is fine, we SHOULD have it in > net80211, I just don't think it's been tested in a long time.) There's > also off-channel traffic support which I know we don't currently do. Na.. not VLAN over WLAN (well, yeah, that needs to be looked into also), hostapd is able to shove STAs into different VLANs (on the wired interface) based on Radius rules. -- Bernhard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208241951.06694.bschmidt>