Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:54:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs Message-ID: <199607242154.PAA02423@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960724174738.28155M-100000@ki.net> References: <199607241949.NAA01813@rocky.mt.sri.com> <Pine.NEB.3.94.960724174738.28155M-100000@ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Anon CVS ]> > > I've had users ask me fo rthis for the postgres95 repository, > and the argument they used was tha twith CVS, they don't have to deal > with having *(their* changes overwritten, cvs will merge the new changes > from the repository in with the changes they have made... > > Can sup do this? If they SUP the CVS tree and don't expect to use the CVS tree locally except for testingt, yes. Almost all of the FreeeBSD developers do this exact thing as your pstgres developers are asking. Heck, I'm doing it now with un-tested PC-CARD/APM changes even as we speak, and CVS keeps them up to date for me as other changes go in. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607242154.PAA02423>