Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:40:50 -0430 From: Alberto Mijares <amijaresp@gmail.com> To: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: explicit use of /etc/rc.d vs service Message-ID: <CAGZBXN9q498yLQn-WV%2BD%2BUkQncd%2BLXidO_YHVvHr4c4Od70ymg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPJF9w=OJNoR6%2BjxzZBUv4YR-9auhSSrXTR0Udzi6TVRpeWkyQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPJF9w=OJNoR6%2BjxzZBUv4YR-9auhSSrXTR0Udzi6TVRpeWkyQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/1/23 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> > >> Would anyone object to a patch which converts uses of >> "/etc/rc.d/daemon start" to "service daemon start" and the like? >> I would like to see service(1) become the standard interface to using >> services. >> > > What it will do if there is both /etc/rc.d/A and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/A > ? > Currently, what if there are both (as above) and you include A_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf ??? Which one is started? Regards Alberto Mijareshelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGZBXN9q498yLQn-WV%2BD%2BUkQncd%2BLXidO_YHVvHr4c4Od70ymg>