Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:18:25 +0900 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r296861 - in head/sys: arm/arm powerpc/powerpc Message-ID: <20160315101825.0b8ecf13@zapp> In-Reply-To: <201603141455.u2EEtFSL014609@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201603141455.u2EEtFSL014609@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Author: bz > Date: Mon Mar 14 14:55:15 2016 > New Revision: 296861 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296861 > > Log: > Only check for SYS_freebsd6_lseek if the syscall code is defined. > Whether this is the right or best solution is unclear but it fixes > the build for now. We should make it an error if someone tries to build an ARM kernel with COMPAT_FREEBSD6. I think there was some support for ARM in 6, however we have switched the ABI since then so any old programs will now fail to run. Having it would be even more of a bug on armv6. This was added for 10.0 and, given running arm (v4/v5) programs on an armv6 kernel is unsupported there should be no reason to include it in the kernel. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160315101825.0b8ecf13>