Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 10:11:10 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@flamingo.McKusick.COM> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, trustedbsd-discuss@trustedbsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed changes to suser() Message-ID: <16750.957773470@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 May 2000 22:25:09 PDT." <200005080525.WAA15248@flamingo.McKusick.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200005080525.WAA15248@flamingo.McKusick.COM>, Kirk McKusick writes: >Overall, I like your proposal. However, I would really like to >see the elimination of suser_xxx. This was a hack because it >was deemed too intrusive to go through and change every use >of suser to change it from one to three parameters. But if you >are going to go through and make a change to every instance of >suser anyway, how about we fix this bogosity and get one clean >interface. I agree. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16750.957773470>