Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:01:36 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Webcam recommendations Message-ID: <201103211301.36287.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201103211242.15230.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <20110321112141.GA23421@sh4-5.1blu.de> <201103211242.15230.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 21 March 2011 12:42:15 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2011 12:21:41 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > That's why I think that the man pages of webcamd are not enough, there > > should be a note about if v4l or v4l2 is awaited from the application; > > or we need some overall table describing the cams(...) from all webcamd > > drivers and the application which can be used. > > Hi, > > I found it! > > CONFIG_COMPAT was not defined during build, so the webcam'd V4L2->V4L1 > layer was never compiled. Can you compile the svn version of webcamd and > report back? Looks like I was too quick about that. Anyway, maybe you could bother to add some prints in: v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c Because the V4l1 -> V4L2 translation should already be in place. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103211301.36287.hselasky>