Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:20:56 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, =?utf-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_P=C4=99kala?= <pawel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r350792 - head/emulators/tme Message-ID: <65A56C9B-D8B0-4940-888F-DB1EE6CD1544@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140410101619.GD8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201404100911.s3A9B8BV042081@svn.freebsd.org> <BC4E068BFADC0B6D6F034A05@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140410094640.GB8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140410121133.000066f7@freebsd.org> <20140410101619.GD8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Apr 2014, at 11:16, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > The day gtk20 does not depends anymore on this you are doomed if those = deps are > explicitly depended on by your port It depends on whether these are real direct dependencies or not. If = they were bugs in the original (i.e. it only depended on X because it = depended on Y and Y needs X) then removing them was the right thing to = do. If they are real direct dependencies (i.e. it needs Y independent = of X, but X happens to depend on Y) then they should be explicit. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65A56C9B-D8B0-4940-888F-DB1EE6CD1544>