Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:22:11 -0700 From: Richy Kim <richy@apple.com> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <200106151921.MAA01794@scv1.apple.com> In-Reply-To: <20010615171239.B935@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 08:12 AM, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Richy Kim (richy@apple.com): > >> I'm trying to evaluate the core functionality of libh in contrast to >> pkg_install command line tools. >> (dependency checking, install/deinstall, conflicts, etc ..) > > That's not possible. > libh's current packaging system completely replaces the pkg_install > tools, but uses a completely different database and so on. Yes exactly, I totally understand it's independence from pkg_install, that is why we are evaluating it. What I meant to say, is the state of libh (and it's scripts) at a point where it can demonstrate "package management" functionality , as opposed to just the UI elements... as you said in the earlier email of packagetool.tcl script being out-dated(broken), is that what is (soley) needed to test the packaging features? (sorry in advance if i'm totally missing a piece from the big picture) thanx -r. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106151921.MAA01794>