Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:36:19 -0500 From: Jim Conner <jconner@enterit.com> To: "Stan Brown" <stanb@awod.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (Free BSD Questions list) Subject: Re: Any reason NOT to upgrade perl on a STABLE machine? Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20001223163607.0229ad60@mail.enterit.com> In-Reply-To: <20001223205451.9B1DC37B400@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I can't think of any reason :) - Jim At 03:54 PM 12/23/2000 -0500, Stan Brown wrote: >Is there any reason that I should NOT upgrade to a later version of perl, >than is >bundled by default with STABLE? > > >-- >Stan Brown stanb@awod.com 843-745-3154 >Charleston SC. >-- >Windows 98: n. > useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and > a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system > originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit > company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. >- >(c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message - Jim - NOTJames - jconner@enterit.com - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - | Today's errors, in contrast: | - | Windows - "Invalid page fault in module kernel32.dll at 0032:A16F2935" | - | UNIX - "segmentation fault - core dumped" | - | Humans - "OOPS, I've fallen and I can't get up" | - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - (To view this properly use a non-proportional font in your MUA) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.0.20001223163607.0229ad60>