Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:40:55 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        fli+freebsd-current@shapeshifter.se
Cc:        benlutz@datacomm.ch, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Linksys EG1032 rev. 3 patch
Message-ID:  <20051003.154055.08405729.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051003.132634.20912224.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <433F976F.6090501@samsco.org> <433FB9B9.9020207@shapeshifter.se> <20051003.132634.20912224.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20051003.132634.20912224.imp@bsdimp.com>
            "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: Checking for 0x10 vs 0x15 for a card that has gone from rev 2 to rev 3
: just strikes me as unwise.

I just checked a few datasheets.  The rev field typically is the
revision of the silicon and is hardwired.  The vendor ID and vendor
device fields, in contrast, often come from eeprom.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051003.154055.08405729.imp>