Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 20:00:34 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@saarinen.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Nuno Teixeira" <nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com> Cc: "Guilherme Oliveira" <guilherme@nortenet.pt>, "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENMCDAA.juha@saarinen.org> In-Reply-To: <20010508005753.A87660@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:: The risk is the same in Linux; they both use gcc, and it's gcc which :: has the optimizer bugs. It's more common to use absurd gcc :: optimizations in the Linux community for some reason (perhaps they're :: used to code misbehaving, so additional brokenness from the gcc :: doesn't add much ;-) :: :: Just Say No. Hrrmm... that's tantamount to saying Linux and FreeBSD has a fundamentally b0rken compiler. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENMCDAA.juha>