Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 15:53:30 +1100 From: "Joe Shevland" <joe.shevland@horizonti.com> To: <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Socket IO problems using Java Sockets on FreeBSD Message-ID: <199802240508.VAA04864@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- > From: Alex Boisvert <alex@gel.usherb.ca> > To: Iyer Mahadevan <iyer@internetdevices.com> > Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG; saurabh@internetdevices.com; freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; java-port@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Socket IO problems using Java Sockets on FreeBSD > Date: Tuesday, 24 February 1998 13:13 > > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Iyer Mahadevan wrote: > > I noticed some serious performance problems with Java Socket I/O. > > > I don't know why Nagle's algorithm is the default... This may be > platform-specific. Anyway, this shows up on Windows NT as well. I'm pretty sure Nagle's algorithm is the default for all implementations of TCP/IP purely because of the overhead associated with the various packet headers etc. i.e. be careful with the TCP_NODELAY flag. Interesting to know how much data exactly was used in the benchmarks, and whether 5 samples are enough statistically speaking. ********************************************************************** Joe Shevland - Horizon Technologies International Email: joe.shevland@horizonti.com We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars - Oscar Wilde ********************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802240508.VAA04864>