Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:28:23 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/nullfs null.h null_subr.c null_vnops.c Message-ID: <p05210633bb17af1823e3@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20030619121550.H51411@hub.org> References: <2687.1056023029@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030619121550.H51411@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:16 PM -0300 6/19/03, The Hermit Hacker wrote: >On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > My comments about nullfs and unionfs, shoul not be construed > > as I want to kill those features, it was more meant as "they > > will not be my primary priorities and if they break > > temporarily, so be it." > >Ah, well, 'break temporarily' doesn't worry me too much ... I >just got the impression of "rip out completely" from your one >note, which had me concerned :( If you have a bad enough situation, then sometimes the best way to start fixing it is by just ripping out what's there... But if I remember right, Poul was talking about work that would be started in the 6.x-branch. There should be plenty of time before 6.x is the branch that anyone would *need* to use in production, and presumably the new improved versions would be in place before that time. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05210633bb17af1823e3>