Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:00:43 +0200 From: Yann Berthier <yb@bashibuzuk.net> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: netgraph on disc(4) Message-ID: <20060530120043.GA1540@bashibuzuk.net> In-Reply-To: <20060529115146.GQ27819@cell.sick.ru> References: <20060528194319.GL1424@bashibuzuk.net> <20060529115146.GQ27819@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 May 2006, at 15:51, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:43:19PM +0200, Yann Berthier wrote:
> Y>
> Y> Hello Gleb,
> Y>
> Y> err, sorry for the forward if you saw the thread already but, have
> Y> you any input on this ? that's not critical but still, i see value in
> Y> being able to use ng_netflow on traffic flowing on dummy interfaces
> Y> (lo, disc, ...)
>
> I've have written some code to wrap any interface some time ago. Here
> it is attached. Sorry, I didn't ever used it and not sure it is compilable
> on recent FreeBSD versions.
Many thanks - so, it compiles on a one month old -CURRENT, but it
fails when i try to use it on a loopback interface - i'm able to wrap
a real one though:
mkpeer ifwrap qq upper
name .:qq wrap_disc0
disconnect .:qq
msg wrap_disc0: attach "disc0"
ngctl: send msg: Operation not supported
Anyway, do others see an interest in it ? would it be worth
integrating it into the tree ? Except for ng_netflow over loopback
links, would there be other consumers of this feature ?
- yann
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060530120043.GA1540>