Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 19:49:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, wes@softweyr.com, brett@lariat.org, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <199907151949.MAA03679@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <70188.932009916@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 14, 99 08:38:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Wrong. They have Larry McVoy's "BitKeeper", which addresses a > > Who's "they", and please don't answer "The Linux community" or > anything else which is equivalently vague to the point of absurdity, > please be specific. Which group(s) are using it and what are the URLs > pointing to on-line proof of this in each case? Linux Torvalds. Paragraph 3: http://www.bitkeeper.com/bk05.html Paragraph 2: http://www.bitkeeper.com/bk06.html > I ask these questions because your statement strongly implies that > this technology is in active use now by "them" and that contradicts > other statements I heard at USENIX, making the question of tangible > proof somewhat relevant in deciding which story is true. > > Also please note that I'm not asking "which people will be using > bitkeeper" or "which people are thinking of using bitkeeper", I'm > asking who the current, active poster-children users of this product > are. VA research, Intel, SGI (I assume this is Jeremy Allison), and Quantum. See paragraph 1: http://www.bitkeeper.com/bk06.html Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907151949.MAA03679>