Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:28:52 +0000 From: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu Cc: chuckr@mat.net, Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Changing sh for compatibility sake Message-ID: <E0zZEbk-00004B-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Chet Ramey's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:56:00 -0500" References: <981027145600.AA08055.SM@nike.ins.cwru.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chet Ramey <chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu> writes: > > Have you ever seen an installer script written by a company that > > *didn't* supply the entire OS, be written in any shell BUT sh? > > Checkpoint writes all of its Firewall-1 installation (and other) > scripts in csh. As did the veritas netbackup I recently installed at work; it's quite a disturbing trend. -Dom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0zZEbk-00004B-00.qmail>