Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:53:35 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <hlen@ig.com.br> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages? Message-ID: <20040123235335.GA93595@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4011A806.9080809@ig.com.br> References: <4011A806.9080809@ig.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:02:30PM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wr= ote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >What do you mean by "policy for 5.1 package-feeding"? >=20 > I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software? > For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to > compile the whole thing. > Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter? Packages for releases are not updated. See http://www.freebsd.org/ports for more information. Kris --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAEbP+Wry0BWjoQKURAk+XAJ9seoCK+3IuYGhcpn1LYZzrd/kZsgCeO9Tz 9lgh3FKfJwlN38sNMIMCmKY= =52qv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040123235335.GA93595>