Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:44:56 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r253563 - head/contrib/libstdc++/include/c_std
Message-ID:  <20130728144456.486359e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <B2D786F9-E807-4F9D-89BA-A2B244B87C99@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201307231023.r6NANhGf065713@svn.freebsd.org> <20130725201948.2f5ae808@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <7D9DA326-0F32-44D2-92F9-EED0751F9AE0@FreeBSD.org> <20130726122654.19448832@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <B2D786F9-E807-4F9D-89BA-A2B244B87C99@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/sMaHl=NSlGb1CPzpvCdD.I_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:51:43 +0100 David Chisnall wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2013, at 11:26, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:43:07 +0100 David Chisnall wrote:
>>> On 25 Jul 2013, at 19:19, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> wrote:
>>>> This also
>>>> broke compilation of C code with -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500.
>>>=20
>>> Do you have a test case for this?
>>=20
>> % cc -c test.c -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -Wall -std=3Dgnu89
>> test.c:5:10: warning: implicit declaration of function 'isnan'
>>      [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>        return( isnan( d ));
>>                ^
>> 1 warning generated.
>>=20
>> The isnan function is part of SUSv2:
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7990989775/xsh/isnan.html
>>=20
>> _XOPEN_SOURCE is handled in sys/cdefs.h. It sets the following macros:
>> #define __XSI_VISIBLE           500
>> #define __POSIX_VISIBLE         199506
>> #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE         1990
>=20
> So, isnan and isinf should be visible in functions when in
> __ISO_C_VISIBLE < 1999 and __XSI_VISIBLE < 600, and __XSI_VISIBLE  >=3D 5=
00?

Is it possible to put them back where they were but behind
#if __cplusplus < 201103L ? That would be the least disruptive.

--Sig_/sMaHl=NSlGb1CPzpvCdD.I_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlH1Ek0ACgkQfoCS2CCgtivDJAD+LWmjpWTZoY5liBpgRUgMUKvr
+xAsX9JTmw84SCxrDrMA/1nnfUvMqaSZjldlr7RHNPYxnAY/pvAbvc9Pf5SB3P8a
=99UG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/sMaHl=NSlGb1CPzpvCdD.I_--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130728144456.486359e0>