Date: 21 Jan 2005 11:02:31 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Ian Moore <imoore@picknowl.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpd problems since upgrading to 5.3 - found the problem! Message-ID: <44651qsrc8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <200501220015.57752.imoore@picknowl.com.au> References: <200501112100.10680.imoore@picknowl.com.au> <200501181740.33206.imoore@picknowl.com.au> <44acr6n7by.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200501220015.57752.imoore@picknowl.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Moore <imoore@picknowl.com.au> writes: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:54, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Ian Moore <imoore@picknowl.com.au> writes: > > > I've just realised I'm not running a name server at all on my 5.3 system. > > > I have 4.9 installed on this computer too & I'd set up the caching server > > > on it, I guess I forgot that step when I installed 5.3. > > > I'll set it up & see that makes any difference. > > > > Make sure to switch to using domain names that aren't in use by other > > people... > > > > [A common convention is to use ".lan" or ".local" as the top-level > > domain if you are using non-public domain names.] > > Thanks, I hadn't thought of using a non-existant top level domain. I've > changed the hostname to daemon.foo.lan and now localhost.foo.lan resolves to > 127.0.0.1 as it should. > Unfortunately, I still get the same response form ntpq: > daemon:~ % sudo ntpq -p > ntpq: write to localhost.foo.lan failed: Permission denied > Even with my firewall disabled I get this response. What about "ntpq -pn"?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44651qsrc8.fsf>