Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:38:18 +0200 From: Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> To: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tinybsd- ports question Message-ID: <5412CA0D-A6E7-4318-BD6E-9BC60CC07446@jump-ing.de> In-Reply-To: <49E989B9.8080007@incunabulum.net> References: <49E7AF2B.2020908@jim-liesl.org> <49E989B9.8080007@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 18.04.2009 um 10:05 schrieb Bruce Simpson: > The fact that TinyBSD copies binaries from the host was always what > caused me to side-step it; try doing that on a non-i386 machine, or > for a non-i386 target. > > Having said that, it would be really cool if someone could blend > the strengths of both into NanoBSD... How about not using a chrooted environment, but a whole virtual machine? You can build the TinyBSD host exactly like you need the binaries on your target and then extract the essentials for the boot image. Works like a charme here, speeds up debugging a lot and raises the question why support for ports was added at all. Markus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5412CA0D-A6E7-4318-BD6E-9BC60CC07446>