Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:55:00 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Joerg Wunsch <joerg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: weird limitation on the system's binutils Message-ID: <200607071555.00993.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20060705171517.H18236@fledge.watson.org> References: <200607010009.09231@aldan> <200607051142.28352.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060705171517.H18236@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
середа 05 липень 2006 12:18, Robert Watson написав: > Perhaps the world has changed since that time, but those sound like > pretty good reasons to me. So these are my recollections, but since I'm > not an expert in our toolchain bits, I could be off in the woods somewhere. Can we, perhaps start small and make the libiberty piece centrally available (and of the most recent version)? There is even a port of (devel/gnulibiberty), which its maintainer (CC-ed), I'm sure, will be glad to see obsoleted... We are currently building it four times: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a And installing none... Halving that, and installing the result to be usable by ports would be a decent improvement, would not it? -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607071555.00993.mi%2Bmx>