Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 14:49:14 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: wosch@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-bin@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-libexec@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin Makefile.inc ... Message-ID: <199609230649.OAA13362@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Sep 1996 16:16:57 %2B1000." <199609230616.QAA07471@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > >The files Announce, Changes, Makefile.UNIX, Problems, README, > >bootptab.mcs, dovend.c, dumptab.c, hash.c, hwaddr.h, lookup.c, > >patchlevel.h, readfile.c, trytea.c, trygetif.c, trylook.c, bootpef.c, > >bootptest.c, and print-bootp.c should ***NOT*** have $Id$ because they > >have not been locally modified! > > They have now :-]. Well, there's always delta removal, but I am not sure it's worth it in this particular case. However, if leaving it in creates a precedent and other people think it's ok to simply add $Id$ for the hell of it, then I think they'd better come out before things get too far off the rails. > There is precedence for this change in /bin. E.g., in ls, the following > files haven't been changed locally except to add $Id$: > > Makefile, cmp.c, extern.h, ls.h, stat_flags.c > > Bruce Yes, and make(1), and sh(1).. I'm not sure how much of sh(1)'s modifications are due to $Id$ then the Lite2 merge, or whether it's genuinely had all it's files modified. This is exactly the kind of problem we need to avoid. Sigh, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609230649.OAA13362>