Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 11:48:49 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: Andrew Riabtsev <resident@b-o.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with ng_ether packet flow.. Message-ID: <20040507074849.GA95043@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <832830880.20040507113906@b-o.ru> References: <20040506144616.GA43633@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw> <832830880.20040507113906@b-o.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:39:06AM +0400, Andrew Riabtsev wrote: A> JWW> Why the [ng_ether_rcvdata] won't check if packets should travel to A> JWW> the [bdg_forward] when they are bridged packets? A> A> This is how it should work, you get entrance to low level network A> (lower hook) and upper level (upper). To bridge or not to bridge A> figuring out with ng_bridge or other ng_* modules is up to you to A> decide. Jian-Wei says a reasonable thing. If he described situation right way, then it means that using ng_tee on top of ng_ether is incompatible with bridge(4). Someone should look into it. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507074849.GA95043>