Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:14:27 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> Cc: "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dumb question 'Bad system call' after make world Message-ID: <20031124081324.I85244@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20031122024417.GA93051@pit.databus.com> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337035E3EA4@mail.sandvine.com> <20031122024417.GA93051@pit.databus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Barney Wolff wrote: > Does make world build a kernel? I didn't think so, and OP's message > indicates that make world is all he did. I suspect re-install is the > best answer now. > > Will somebody please tell me when "make world" is ever correct in the > environment of the last several years? I've been unable to understand > its continued existence as a target. I'd call it hysterical raisins, but there are some decomposed targets, which I use regularly: buildworld buildkernel installworld installkernel -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124081324.I85244>