Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:41:10 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-fs <fs@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: rc.d/zpool should require (rw) root? Message-ID: <bed74b01-3627-28aa-054c-abed92f1cb9b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2904FD1B-456C-41A0-B097-52C0EEC711E7@cs.huji.ac.il> References: <556a2f46-9dac-e0bc-10a7-d81bf7c99f5a@FreeBSD.org> <2904FD1B-456C-41A0-B097-52C0EEC711E7@cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/02/2022 13:23, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > >> On 4 Feb 2022, at 12:07, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> >> It seems that in some cases zpool import -c requires read/write access to the zpool.cache file. So, it probably makes sense to import "other" pools (non-root) after upgrading / to rw. >> What do you think? >> > > what if root is ro? i.e: diskless? Then nothing changes. rc.d/root would leave / alone. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bed74b01-3627-28aa-054c-abed92f1cb9b>