Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:57:48 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 273341] Porter's handbook: a meta port should describe itself as such
Message-ID:  <bug-273341-9-KJxpZmd1FN@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-273341-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-273341-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273341

--- Comment #6 from Graham Perrin =E2=97=90 <grahamperrin@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa from comment #5)

If there's no value, then why do so many meta ports describe themselves as
such?=20

<https://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-kmod/>;

> Metaport of DRM modules for the linuxkpi-based KMS components

And so on.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273341-9-KJxpZmd1FN>